Where does your hit come from? — turning the key of training
When you truly hit — not by luck, but in that way you feel whole — there's a question almost no one asks: where did that hit come from? What state were you in? What was your breathing like? What did your body feel an instant before you said "it's this one"? The game isn't just guessing: it's discovering where your right information comes from. That discovery is the key of the training.
First, the honest ground: the scoreboard
To study your true hits, you need to know which ones they were — and here feeling alone deceives. 🟢 Kahneman showed that valid intuition and overconfidence feel exactly the same from the inside. And neuroscientist Sarah Garfinkel separated three things almost everyone mixes up: real accuracy (measured against reality), feeling (how intuitive you feel) and metacognition (knowing when you're right). The three barely go together.
That's why the scoreboard is your ground. Chance gives you the bar for free — Zener symbols 20%, card colour 50%, number from 1 to 10 = 10% — and the reading is the trend across weeks, counting every round, not just the good ones. One session tells you nothing; the line across the month does.
Turning the key: where did the hit come from
Here is the heart of the training. 🟡 On every true hit, pause for two seconds and map your field — what you can embrace with your attention: the body, the emotions, what you were feeling in that moment:
- What state were you in? Calm, agitated, tired, present?
- What was your breath like? Slow and deep, or held in the chest?
- What did the body do an instant before — open, warm up, tingle, settle?
- What thought (or what silence) preceded the answer?
- How did it arrive? Did you see it, feel it, or simply know it?
A single hit tells you none of this — but weeks of logging do. A pattern starts to appear: your true hits come almost always from the same place — the same calm, the same breath, the same kind of signal. It's your signature.
Once you know that place, the training changes nature: you stop trying to guess and start returning to the state your hits come from — and recognising when you're there and when you're not. 🟢 Science supports the mechanism behind this: pattern recognition is trained through repetition and immediate feedback (Kahneman & Klein), and the body signals before the mind concludes (Damasio). The name you give that place — attunement, frequency, presence — is yours and valid as experience; what the scoreboard gives you back, honestly, is whether returning to that place translates into hits.
The one-line log
🟡 The tool is humble: at the end of each session, one line — state/breath · what the body did · how it arrived (saw / felt / knew) · scoreboard. Thirty seconds. It's this log that, week after week, takes the puzzle apart and shows you the pieces — the concrete conditions that repeat on your hits.
Measuring the inner screen
🟢 For the clarity of closed-eyes vision there's a measure validated since 1973: the VVIQ — 16 scenes to imagine and rate. Baseline today, re-test every 3-4 weeks; the reading is always the trend, never the day. And an honest note: if your screen stays truly blank, aphantasia exists (Zeman, 2015) — a real variation of the brain, not a failure; in that case your channel may be feeling or knowing, and it's just as valid.
Where there's nothing to learn
🟢 Kahneman and Klein showed this training only works where there are real regularities + immediate feedback. In the lottery and in pure noise there's no pattern for your field to learn — if it seems to work, it's variance. The game deliberately gives you the opposite: a regular environment and immediate reveal, round after round.
The scoreboard and the key
The scoreboard tells you when you truly hit. Your log tells you where it came from. Joining them is turning the key: the training stops being hope and becomes a concrete path — more mature, more consistent, yours. Trust the process — and let the scoreboard confirm it to you.
- Garfinkel & Critchley, Knowing your own heart, Biological Psychology (2015)
- Kahneman, Thinking Fast and Slow (2011)
- Kahneman & Klein, Conditions for Intuitive Expertise (2009)
- Damasio, Descartes' Error (1994)
- Marks, VVIQ, British Journal of Psychology (1973)
- Zeman et al., Cortex (2015) — afantasia